Hi Georg, On 20:04 Wed 01 Feb , Georg Faerber wrote: > On 17-02-01 20:27:54, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote: > > I have already prepared an update (3.7.2-4+deb8u1, available on [0]) > > and will file for a jessie-pu to get the SRM's opinion on this. > > We've just spoken for a while in IRC how to proceed with this and had > "invented" a plan of action, which was a bit different, but anyway, your > proposal is much better. Thanks for this! > > > I think we should deal with Puppet 4 supporting PuppetDB the same way > > (i.e. ship the termini directly in puppet) via an unblock request after > > 4.8.2-1 has migrated to testing. > > So, in this case, there is no need for an extra puppet-termini package, > right?
Well, for puppet 4 we could add a puppet-terminus-puppetdb binary package to the puppet source. I don't think it makes sense to upload the PuppetDB source just for a couple of Ruby files which are not a direct part of PuppetDB anyway. > > > Opinions/ideas? > > All in all, I really like your proposal. > > Two (minor) notes: > > - I'm wondering if d/NEWS should be extended giving an example how to > do the export and import. I'll probably add a new README file for that. > > - This should be documented in the stretch release / upgrade notes. Sure, I'll make a note for that. We also need to document a couple of other issues, including the fact that PuppetDB is not yet packaged etc. Cheers, Apollon