Ximin Luo wrote: > this particular scheme might not work so well with large archives > with lots and lots of members
Mm although unlikely to be a serious problem as we aren't iterating over the directory. > Also, are you sure this doesn't interfere with the detection of > order-only differences, or the ability to match up > similar-member-names? We still use the archive's member name throughout diffoscope; the unpacked path shouldn't leak outside of that comparator. Also, the tests pass… *g* Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-