On Wednesday, 8 February 2017 20:47:07 CET Gard Spreemann wrote: > On Wednesday, 8 February 2017 18:46:46 CET Roger Shimizu wrote: > > > > - have separated -doc package > > The documentation shipped with upstream's source is rather > limited. They instead ship a dedicated tarball for documentation > [1]. I intend to package it too, and have it provide the -doc > package. > > Does this sound sensible to you?
Scratch that. My package now generates the doxygen documentation and builds a -doc package. > I'll upload a new version to mentors.debian.net when I hear back > from upstream regarding the missing copyrights. Upstream say they will take into account my remarks regarding licensing for the next release. I'll upload a new version to mentors when that happens. The version on https://git.nonempty.org/debian-gudhi/ has diverged a bit from the mentors one meanwhile. Most importantly, it now builds a -doc and an -examples package. Any comments would be greatly appreciated. Best regards, Gard