On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Javier Serrano Polo <jav...@jasp.net> wrote: > X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-alsa-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > El dc 21 de 09 de 2016 a les 10:36 -0300, Felipe Sateler va escriure: >> Alsa maintainers, what do you think? > > Maintainers remain silent. > >> Adding a similar check for a variable named >> like PULSE_DISABLE_ALSA_PLUGIN or something like that should be very >> simple. > > Felipe, what do you prefer? To apply the patch with PULSE_ALSA_HOOK_CONF > in pulseaudio or if I implement PULSE_DISABLE_ALSA_PLUGIN in ALSA and > you do a NMU?
I am definitely not comfortable doing an NMU of alsa for this. Could you check with the release team if this change would be OK for stretch? Otherwise I can queue this up for buster. Either way, I'd still prefer if this was done upstream on the alsa side. Could you propose such a patch to the upstream alsa developers? -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler