Hi Emilio,

16.02.2017 03:25, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort пишет:
> The request is for the swi-prolog-java binary package only, the
> submitter got the subject wrong.

Ahh. I've used reportbug and entered swi-prolog-java as a package name
in the corresponding dialog, but source package was substituted
automatically. I should have been more careful. I've tried to reproduce
it and succeseded, here is the full dialog:

-=-=-=-

$ reportbug ftp.debian.org
*** Welcome to reportbug.  Use ? for help at prompts. ***
Note: bug reports are publicly archived (including the email address of
the submitter).
Detected character set: UTF-8
Please change your locale if this is incorrect.

Using 'Lev Lamberov <dogs...@debian.org>' as your from address.
Will send report to Debian (per lsb_release).
What sort of request is this? (If none of these things mean anything to
you, or you are trying to report a bug in an existing package, please
press Enter to exit reportbug.)

 1 ANAIS     Package removal - Architecture Not Allowed In Source.
 2 ICE       Package removal - Internal Compiler Error.
 3 NBS       Package removal - Not Built [by] Source.
 4 NPOASR    Package removal - Never Part Of A Stable Release.
 5 NVIU      Package removal - Newer Version In Unstable.
 6 ROM       Package removal - Request Of Maintainer.
 7 ROP       Package removal - Request of Porter.
 8 RoQA      Package removal - Requested by the QA team.
 9 other     Not a package removal request, report other problems.
10 override  Change override request.

Choose the request type: 6
Please enter the name of the package: swi-prolog-java
Checking status database...
Is the removal to be done in a suite other than "unstable"? Don't select
anything for "unstable"

1 experimental                Experimental.
2 oldstable                   Old stable.
3 oldstable-proposed-updates  Old stable proposed updates.
4 stable                      Stable.
5 stable-proposed-updates     Stable proposed updates.
6 testing                     Testing only (NOT unstable)
7 testing-proposed-updates    Testing proposed updates

Choose the suite: 6
Please enter the reason for removal: FTBFS
Is this removal request for specific architectures? [y|N|?]? y
Please enter the arch list separated by a space: mips
Partial removal for testing; forcing suite to 'unstable', since it's the
proper way to do that.

Spawning sensible-editor...
No changes were made in the editor.
Report will be sent to Debian Bug Tracking System <sub...@bugs.debian.org>
Submit this report on ftp.debian.org (e to edit)
[y|n|a|c|E|i|l|m|p|q|d|t|s|?]? q
Saving a backup of the report at
/tmp/reportbug-ftp.debian.org-backup-20170216-20180-_uoez_jz
Bug report written as /tmp/reportbug-ftp.debian.org-20170216-20180-p0d5a_n5

-=-=-=-

And here is what it outputs:

$ cat /tmp/reportbug-ftp.debian.org-20170216-20180-p0d5a_n5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Lev Lamberov <dogs...@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <sub...@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RM: swi-prolog [mips] -- ROM; FTBFS
Bcc: Lev Lamberov <dogs...@debian.org>

Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal

(please explain the reason for the removal here)

Note: this was a request for a partial removal from testing, converted
in one for unstable

-=-=-=-

What do you think, should it be reported as a bug in reportbug?

Thanks for your input, Emilio!

Cheers!
Lev

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to