severity 855851 wishlist
thanks
On 2017-02-22 14:01, Santiago Vila wrote:
Dear maintainer:
Would be possible to get rid of gcc-3.3 in stretch?
We don't have gcc-5 anymore in stretch, so it would be really strange
that we still need gcc-3.3 (even if it's only the source) which is a
lot older.
If we really need gcc-3.3 in stretch, please downgrade and document
the reason here, so that it serves as documentation.
Thanks.
Why would I need to justify package presence in a serious RC bug? Wat?
It only builds libstdc++5. It's not even a full compiler. That's for
compatibility with old binaries.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
