On February 26, 2017 2:15:25 PM EST, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote: >On 02/26/2017 07:48 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >> I don't insist on anything. I noticed that this package does not >depend on >> libssl after building and that is why I took a look. > >Interesting. So, I guess the best option would actually to drop the B-D >on >libssl-dev completely. I have checked it myself and indeed libkf5khtml5 >does >not depend on libssl at all. Plus, the package also builds fine with >the >build dependency on libssl-dev completely removed. > >Lisandro, maybe just dropping the build dependency on libssl-dev would >be >the best option if it's actually not used at all?
We shouldn't be changing the way a package builds during freeze. It was last built with openssl 1.0, so that's what we should have for now. Scott K