reopen 338157 reassign 338157 firefox severity 338157 wishlist forwarded 338157 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=232272 thanks
* CAiRO ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hey, > > I thought it was the package maintainer's task to think of solutions > for bugs. I didn't know I had to provide one when reporting a bug. > > Anyway, here are my suggestions: > > 1) I don't really know much about Debian packaging but as far as I know > (correct me if I'm wrong) you could declare the search plugins as > config files. So I can change them (or delete them) and I'll at least > get asked what to do about them on the next firefox package upgrade. I could declare the search plugins to be conffiles, but they're not and I won't abuse the system to just make them removable. > 2) If 1 isn't possible, remove them from the package. (Maybe put them > in an extra package so people who want them can still install them.) Most people want them, I see no reason to exclude them. Looks like Firefox 2 will have a better management interface for them. > Thanks in advance. -- Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
