On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Aron Xu <a...@debian.org> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:19 AM, Samuel Henrique <samuel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> How about building a dummy package from iptraf-ng? >> Yeah, that's a much better solution! >> >> NEW iptraf package containing iptraf-ng and iptraf-ng upgraded to a dummy >> package depending on iptraf. >> >> I was going to ask permission to help you two in the iptraf/iptraf-ng >> packaging while getting the package under the pkg-security team some days >> before the freeze, but then i thought it would be better to discuss this >> after Stretch's release. >> >> I see that iptraf-ng is on collab-main, i can work there with your >> permission and prepare this today (on the next 8 hours). >> iptraf will need another upload and its packaging is not on git, so i should >> prepare a NMU and put it on mentors (i'm not really sure if a NMU applies on >> this case, but my changelog entry can be signed and changed by any of you, >> either way). >> > > I've made a new upload of iptraf-ng providing a transitional dummy > package, and updated the Git repo. If you need further changes, please > feel free to make changes and upload. >
Bad news is that the version number is smaller than previous package (3.0.0-8.1 vs 1.1.4-5)... >> Then we will need to ask for a freeze-unblock of iptraf and iptraf-ng, which >> should be accepted without trouble considering the case. >> >> Of course, that is if you don't prefer to do it yourself, please feel free >> to ask for help on any stage. >> >> Thanks for the quick reply :) >> >> Samuel Henrique <samueloph> >> >> 2017-03-21 10:02 GMT-03:00 Aron Xu <a...@debian.org>: >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Frederic Peters <fpet...@debian.org> >>> wrote: >>> > Hi Samuel, >>> > >>> >> Also, i can help with the fix, given the maintainers permission to do >>> >> so. >>> > >>> > Of course I am totally fine with this. >>> > >>> >>> How about building a dummy package from iptraf-ng? >>> >>> Aron >> >>
