Gerfried Fuchs wrote:

Package: spca5xx-modules-2.6.15-1-686
Version: 20060101+1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 7.2

       Hi!

The modules packages slipped into testing because they don't depend on
their corresponding kernel images they are built against. They don't
make any sense standalone without their kernel, thus please add a
Depends on the kernel-image to them.

Yes, very bad mistake indeed, apologies and this should be fixed in our working copy.

Furthermore, a mailinglist -request address as maintainer address is a
*very* bad idea, I seriously hope you consider changing that, too.

I did not see this in our sources anywhere, can you please be more specific about this problem?

Maintainer: Debian spca5xx Maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

So long,
Alfie

Thanks, Kel.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to