Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Package: spca5xx-modules-2.6.15-1-686
Version: 20060101+1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 7.2
Hi!
The modules packages slipped into testing because they don't depend on
their corresponding kernel images they are built against. They don't
make any sense standalone without their kernel, thus please add a
Depends on the kernel-image to them.
Yes, very bad mistake indeed, apologies and this should be fixed in our
working copy.
Furthermore, a mailinglist -request address as maintainer address is a
*very* bad idea, I seriously hope you consider changing that, too.
I did not see this in our sources anywhere, can you please be more
specific about this problem?
Maintainer: Debian spca5xx Maintainers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
So long,
Alfie
Thanks, Kel.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]