control: tag -1 +moreinfo On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 09:10:52AM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: > Thanks for your review!
No problem. > I think these are all simple fix that suitable for stretch. > The policy don't require pre-approval to upload to unstable [0]. > > If the unblock is rejected, and someone need to to fix another RC bug for > this package, it's still possible since we have "testing-proposed-updates" > [0]. I think you've misunderstood both the freeze policy, and testing-proposed-updates. Firstly, most/all of your changes fail to satisfy any of the bullet points under "Changes which can be considered" in the freeze policy. So the unblock request will be denied. Secondly, testing-proposed-updates is highly inconvenient for the release team. It requires manual intervention and slows everything down. So we shouldn't upload to unstable unless we *expect* it to be unblocked. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
