Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hud...@canonical.com> writes: > Makes sense to me, I'd be happy to upload that change to experimental.
Great, thanks! > What's the timeframe for gccgo-7 getting into unstable? Just waiting for > buster development to open? Presumably; I'm not aware of another reason to hold off. (An official 7.1 release recently came out, and there aren't experimental versions of binutils or glibc that could need to accompany GCC 7 to unstable.) -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu
