Package: python-dkim
Version: 0.5.4-1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
during testing I was able to provoke aover-length line (82 octets) in a dkim
signature. as
I understand it this violates a SHOULD directive in the relevant RFC
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=treshna.com;
i=@treshna.com;
q=dns/txt; s=sgd2k; t=1496121847; h=From : Subject : To : Message-Id :
Date; bh=qoHOIb6s/IoF2dz4yQePEAiAs6lyxZDuSOYaI+VXe14=;
b=XCYa8/hC6AWGOMxAMqoCOBs0o58cJ3QVVsm3iJc5C7dRgskUU0HtulpZcgLwASq84IMMkf
Ebu42w7PwHjGtEi2Nxz+/DFs01KTlVVVDbTH7/rM8eiwJN5VNuIX6OFGgD1rbXG6Nl35i1Sq
nU5qpZ0QyNepHp4SqxEnIpJpQDlxkqKmTmhk1azEClKaNH8uyTN04VyxswT9wECY1hkWf8Na
9qhM81LMR2sRf/gplaWMTIHi18mNDtGmDfaDhLbDja45ACinLQ1edzIJUzbN1MyeZhwGI/gQ
IOCyzqBqh5yzKmPtm7rYAtObKYUlbC9y8v7oMkGwC9qf6F46vfwfZjZQ==
I'm guessing that the word-wrapping algorithm is not taking the header-name
into account.
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of this action?
* What outcome did you expect instead?
*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.8
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_NZ.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_NZ.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages python-dkim depends on:
ii python 2.7.9-1
ii python-dns 2.3.6-3
ii python-dnspython 1.12.0-1
python-dkim recommends no packages.
python-dkim suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
