Hello Jeroen On 2006-02-10 Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > On 2006-02-10 Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > > > The mysql-dfsg-5.0 source packages used to produce > > > > mysql-server-4.1 > > > > mysql-client-4.1 > > > > for a short while but removed those packages from the > > > > control file. "britney"(?) now thinks that it accidently failed > > > > to build those and blocks mysql-dfsg-5.0 from entering testing. > > > > > > That's because those packages still are built by mysql-dfsg-4.1 and > > > mysql-dfsg. Please either: > > > - stop building those packages from there, > > Would uploading a new version of the mysql-dfsg-4.1 source > > package with a 4.1.x version i.e. a lower one as that of the > > zombie packages be enough? This would easily possible as the > > package will be removed soon anyway. > > Yeah, as long as you stop building it. I'd suggest stopping to build > anything except the library.
Ok, will do that. > > > - request us to remove those source packages (you can retitle and > > > reassign this bug), or > > I still have 26 open bugs asking other packages no longer to link > > against libmysqlclient12 which is produced by the source package > > mysql-dfsg-4.1, too. > > If people had ample time to migrate and there's no important packages > left, this doesn't need to hold up removal. It's a manageable number of > packages to NMU. Please consult with the release team if you have any > suspicion that such forced migration would cause any problems. I don't > see any really important or big packages listed that haven't migrated yet. NMUs means more work for me *g* But I will do so next week when I've a bit of time. > > > - bump the version numbers of those 4.0 and 4.1 packages so that they > > > would supersede the versions built by mysql-dfsg-5.0 > > I don't like to upload a "mysql-server-4.1 (5.0.x)" package as this > > would confuse the users of testing/unstable. Can it be avoided? > > Yeah, you'd need to epoch it to not have a weird version number. Right, forgot about epochs. But I take the first solution to avoid ugly epochs. thanks, -christian- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
