On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 07:44:23AM -0500, Neil Roeth wrote: > Correct on both counts: it would be just "pushing it ahead", and I am > reluctant at this time to turn off DTDDECL in stable, because that is removing > behavior, though the longer the package remains in unstable with DTDDECL > handling turned off and no complaints, the less reluctant I will be to make > the corresponding change in stable.
What does the DTDDECL thing _do_, BTW? I don't think I've gotten to that part yet :-) But will a workaround for this be to simply use a temporary file instead of reading from a pipe? I guess I can do that, I don't need the validation in production code... /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
