>>>>> "JLT" == José Luis Tallón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi again! JLT> Anders Boström wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Are there any progress in a 1.38 deb? >> JLT> I'm working on 1.38.3: Already added support for "native" TLS tunneling JLT> and Python, plus created the bacula-traymonitor package :-) JLT> I am stuck with static linking of the tools :-S >> Can I help in any way? >> >> JLT> If you are able to make the tools (bscan, bcopy) link statically with JLT> the massive amount of dependencies they have, you're most welcome. JLT> Otherwise, i will be needing beta-testers soon (hopefully) I compiled bacula 1.38.5 without much trouble with dynamic linking. And yes, it seems hard to compile bscan and bcopy static (I didn't try *that* hard...). However, is static linking needed? Why? I can see some obvious advantages with static linking, most notably less dependencies on other packages, but is it really needed? A dynamic linked 1.38.5 might be better than a static 1.36... / Anders
