On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:24:37PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Which is because m68k is not in the Architecture: list and not yet supported > at building? Are you going to test m68k modules then? I could enable it > then...
I suppose the Arch: all packages confused me. Perhaps the better solution would be to label this package not-for-us. -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
