Hi Adrian,

thanks a lot for your continuous QA effort (I have the feeling that 90%
of the Debian Med bugs were issued by you ;-) ).

Julien, do you have some explanation for the issue?  I made sure that
cmake files were found also on i386 so the issue now concerns
   Version: 2.3.1-3
but bpp-phyl seems to have issues for non-Intel architectures which
should be dealt by upstream.  I admit that I have not checked version
2.3.1-1 but according to Git the diff is


$ git diff debian/2.3.1-1..debian/2.3.1-2
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 0bfd365..28fd024 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+libbpp-phyl (2.3.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Make sure cmake files will be installed also on i386
+
+ -- Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org>  Thu, 22 Jun 2017 08:03:24 +0200
+
 libbpp-phyl (2.3.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * New upstream version
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index 9d1fe92..3a46afc 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -15,5 +15,5 @@ override_dh_install:
                    --override 
's/libbpp-\([-a-z]\+\)[0-9]\+-dev/libbpp-\1-dev/' \
                    --exclude-la \
                     --movedev debian/tmp/usr/include/* usr/include \
-                    --movedev debian/tmp/usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)/cmake 
usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE) \
+                    --movedev debian/tmp/usr/lib/*/cmake 
usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE) \
                     debian/tmp/usr/lib/*/*.so


So I can not see any explanation for the test failures since the test is
run before dh_install anyway.  I suspect some deeper issue here.

Kind regards

      Andreas.

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 08:13:02PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: libbpp-phyl
> Version: 2.3.1-2
> Severity: serious
> 
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libbpp-phyl&suite=sid
> 
> I do not see any obvious reason why 2.3.1-2 fails on so many
> architectures where 2.3.1-1 built just a few hours earlier.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

Reply via email to