Hi Adrian, thanks a lot for your continuous QA effort (I have the feeling that 90% of the Debian Med bugs were issued by you ;-) ).
Julien, do you have some explanation for the issue? I made sure that cmake files were found also on i386 so the issue now concerns Version: 2.3.1-3 but bpp-phyl seems to have issues for non-Intel architectures which should be dealt by upstream. I admit that I have not checked version 2.3.1-1 but according to Git the diff is $ git diff debian/2.3.1-1..debian/2.3.1-2 diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 0bfd365..28fd024 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +libbpp-phyl (2.3.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Make sure cmake files will be installed also on i386 + + -- Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org> Thu, 22 Jun 2017 08:03:24 +0200 + libbpp-phyl (2.3.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream version diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index 9d1fe92..3a46afc 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -15,5 +15,5 @@ override_dh_install: --override 's/libbpp-\([-a-z]\+\)[0-9]\+-dev/libbpp-\1-dev/' \ --exclude-la \ --movedev debian/tmp/usr/include/* usr/include \ - --movedev debian/tmp/usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)/cmake usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE) \ + --movedev debian/tmp/usr/lib/*/cmake usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE) \ debian/tmp/usr/lib/*/*.so So I can not see any explanation for the test failures since the test is run before dh_install anyway. I suspect some deeper issue here. Kind regards Andreas. On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 08:13:02PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Source: libbpp-phyl > Version: 2.3.1-2 > Severity: serious > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libbpp-phyl&suite=sid > > I do not see any obvious reason why 2.3.1-2 fails on so many > architectures where 2.3.1-1 built just a few hours earlier. -- http://fam-tille.de