Hi Rene,

Thank you for your efforts on this package.

I did update my key recently so expect I can still upload.  Nonetheless it
would be good for the distribution to have this under debian-xml-sgml given
my slow response times-- thank you for suggesting.  I'm happy to see that
change and continue as a co-maintainer.

Regards,
--John


On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 2:58 AM, Rene Engelhard <r...@debian.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:09:43PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > It basically boils down just to
> >
> > $ cat debdiff | filterdiff -i '*debian*'
> > diff -Nru xmlsec1-1.2.23/debian/changelog xmlsec1-1.2.24/debian/
> changelog
> > --- xmlsec1-1.2.23/debian/changelog   2016-12-15 21:09:18.000000000
> +0100
> > +++ xmlsec1-1.2.24/debian/changelog   2017-06-22 18:54:56.000000000
> +0200
> > @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
> > +xmlsec1 (1.2.24-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium
> > +
> > +  * Non-maintainer upload
> > +  * New upstream release (closes: #865539)
> > +
> > + -- Rene Engelhard <r...@debian.org>  Thu, 22 Jun 2017 18:54:56 +0200
> > +
> >  xmlsec1 (1.2.23-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium
> >
> >    * Non-maintainer upload.
> >
> > OK, one might want to run the tests (see #774631) but that also can be
> done
> > later...
> >
> > Used ratt to rebuild the 3 r-deps against 1.2.24 and they succeeded.
>
> It occurred to me that you probably can't upload anyway since your key is
> 1024 and probably
> removed from the keyring.
>
> What do you think of putting xmlsec1 under the umbrealla of the Debian
> XML/SGML Group
> which also maintains other XML related packages:
>
> https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian-
> xml-sgml-p...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
> If you agree I would change Maintainer:, and add you and me to Uploaders:
> (if you still
> want to be co-maintainer)
>
> Otherwise I probably would NMU it relatively quickly, since LO 5.4.0 will
> be released end
> of July and we have waited so long to be able to ditch the internal copy
> of libxmlsec
> that it would be a pity to not (be able to) just do it :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Rene
>

Reply via email to