On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 08:37:50AM +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 6:23 AM, Steve Langasek > <steve.langa...@canonical.com> wrote: > > The snappy 1.1.4 release tarball as distributed by upstream does not match > > its git tag; it contains an additional patch of unclear origin which is > > broken on armhf (as confirmed on harris.d.o). > Ouch! May you know any public QA tool that may be capable of Git tag > and tarball equality check? Say, an uscan extension?
I don't, sorry. > > Attached is a patch, which I've applied in Ubuntu, to address both of these > > issues. I have also written to upstream about the issue of the wrong > > tarball. > Thanks, please ping me if you get any answer. I may think they have > an open source release and an internal version of Snappy and that file > leaked accidentally. I did get a reply; the plan is to release 1.1.5 in the next few weeks, at which point the problem is historical. > > It might be more appropriate to address the missing 'make check' issue by > > instead migrating debian/rules to pure dh(1), but I would leave that to you > > as maintainer to decide. > For the moment I'll stick to the current, old rules format - I plan > to use the short debhelper style for the next release. > > Cheers, > Laszlo/GCS -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
