Control: tag -1 + confirmed
Control: retitle -1 all qemu guests with nec-usb-xhci crash during startup 
(assertion falure)

28.07.2017 00:42, Ulrich Baum wrote:
> Package: qemu-system-x86
> Version: 1:2.8+dfsg-6+deb9u1
> 
> When I try to start any kvm guest via virsh start <guest>, the guest
> crashes during startup. See log extract below.
> Downgrading to qemu-system-x86=1:2.8+dfsg-6 solves the problem.
> 
> Extract from /var/log/libvirt/qemu/guest.log :

>  /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -name guest=a,debug-threads=on -S -object
...
> strict=on -device nec-usb-xhci,id
...
> warning: host doesn't support requested feature: CPUID.01H:EDX.ds [bit 21]
> warning: host doesn't support requested feature: CPUID.01H:EDX.acpi [bit 22]
> warning: host doesn't support requested feature: CPUID.01H:EDX.ht [bit 28]
> warning: host doesn't support requested feature: CPUID.01H:EDX.tm [bit 29]
> warning: host doesn't support requested feature: CPUID.01H:EDX.pbe [bit 31]
> warning: host doesn't support requested feature: CPUID.01H:ECX.dtes64 [bit 2]
> warning: host doesn't support requested feature: CPUID.01H:ECX.monitor [bit 3]
> warning: host doesn't support requested feature: CPUID.01H:ECX.ds-cpl [bit 4]
> warning: host doesn't support requested feature: CPUID.01H:ECX.vmx [bit 5]
> warning: host doesn't support requested feature: CPUID.01H:ECX.est [bit 7]
> warning: host doesn't support requested feature: CPUID.01H:ECX.tm2 [bit 8]
> warning: host doesn't support requested feature: CPUID.01H:ECX.xtpr [bit 14]
> warning: host doesn't support requested feature: CPUID.01H:ECX.pdcm [bit 15]
> warning: host doesn't support requested feature: CPUID.01H:ECX.osxsave [bit 
> 27]

I'm not sure what this means, it'd be interesting to know, but it is unrelated.

> qemu-system-x86_64:
> /build/qemu-0Yb2kr/qemu-2.8+dfsg/hw/usb/hcd-xhci.c:2169:
> xhci_kick_epctx: A
> ssertion `!epctx->kick_active' failed.

And here we go.

This is due to (apparently wrong) security fix in 1:2.8+dfsg-6+deb9u1,
"xhci: guard xhci_kick_epctx against recursive calls".

I'll investigate further.

Thanks!

/mjt

Reply via email to