On Tue 2017-08-01 12:02:50 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > On 31/07/2017 21:03, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> But the fact that we need it is pretty disappointing, and it's not the >> first time that a backwards-incompatible API change was introduced in >> what looks like a minor release of OCaml. (see also the bytes changes >> introduced in 4.02 or 4.03 for example). > > This is not a minor release! Actually, the current version in unstable > is 4.02.3, so 4.05.0 is 3 major releases ahead!
ok, i guess ocaml isn't using standard semantic versioning :P Thanks for
explaining!
> People use conditional compilation in this case.
>
> Actually, here is another patch (without resorting to conditional
> compilation), less elegant but compatible with unstable.
Thanks, i've included this in 1.1.6-6, which i've just uploaded to
unstable.
All the best,
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
