On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 06:25:19AM +0200, Philip Hands wrote: > Just in case it's not already clear from the replies you have received > so far, there is a consensus amongst the members of the TC that you > should do as you suggest -- this was reflected in our recent meeting: > > > http://meetbot.debian.net/debian-ctte/2017/debian-ctte.2017-07-19-18.59.log.html#l-36 > > That being the case, I think you should just get on with fixing it, > rather than awaiting a resolution from us. (of course if other TC > members have some objection to this suggestion, please say so).
Thanks. I haven't had a chance to actually deal with this yet, and won't for at least a couple of weeks, but I agree that there's a clear consensus. (I like the suggestion to just adopt the configuration file outright, which seems like a good way to make it clear that this isn't just two packages playing core wars in the archive; I expect I'll take that approach unless some unforeseen problem arises while implementing it.) If you want to consider this bug closed at this point without a formal resolution, then I'm OK with saving you folks some time, but I also don't object if you want a formal resolution for the project's records. -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]