On 20/08/17 16:42, Chris Lamb wrote:
> tags 871809 + patch
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> > I will implement this soon, this doesn't seem to be too hard
> > to do.
>
> Beat you to it, I think! I've attached:
>
>   commit 24549c61be4c0eea1495e3508377bf46d162230f
>   Author: Chris Lamb <la...@debian.org>
>   Date:   Sun Aug 20 16:25:45 2017 -0700
>
>       Support storing and retrieval of upstream signatures. (Closes: #871809)
>
>       This commit adds support for optionally storing and regenerating an
>       upstream signature with the tarball so that it can be verified by,
>       for example, dpkg-source(1).
>
>       Regardless of the original signature filename provided, it is always
>       stored alongside the .delta and .id files as .sig for deterministic
>       retrieval.
>
>       The existing behaviour of pristine-tar is unchanged unless you specify
>       the `-s` option; in particular, extraction of signatures is not 
> performed
>       by default - one must specify the filename. This is to prevent breaking
>       existing behaviour.
>
>    README         |  3 +++
>    debian/control |  3 +++
>    pristine-tar   | 59 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>    3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
>
> Best wishes,

Thanks, the amount of love pristine-tar is getting these days must
make it blush.

A quick glimpse tells me that it should be ok. Would you mind adding a
test to cover this functionality?

Tomasz

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to