On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 01:20:33AM +0100, Stijn Tintel wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote:
> >Ok. Can you confirm the version of the samba package installed on a > >machine > >that's showing this problem, as send us the output of ls -l /var/lib/samba/ > >/var/cache/samba/ /var/run/samba/ on the affected machine? > It appears that after reinstalling the Debian Samba packages (I created > my own without the FHS patch), the problem does NOT reappear. > I'm having difficulties to understand this, as I completely removed > samba several times in the past month (dpkg --purge), reinstalled, put > my smb.conf back in place, and restarted samba. I always ended up with > only the master browser in my workgroup, untill I installed those > packages I made without the FHS patch. Now it all seems like it never > happened :/ Yes, over the past month, there have been a number of revisions of the Debian Samba package, and significant bugs related to the FHS patch were found and fixed. This makes it very difficult to know how to help you without confirmation from you of the exact package versions that show this bug. > There still is this other box in another workgroup however, where I also > installed those packages I made without the FHS patch to see if it would > solve the problem there. Even without the FHS patch, the workgroup that > box is master browser for, you never guess, only shows the master > browser. It had no problems with 3.0.20b-4. In addition, I reinstalled > the Debian Samba packages on this box too now (after dpkg --purge), > however the problem persists. Any advice welcome here... When you say "master browser", do you mean domain master browser or local master browser? How do you have the machine configured, and how have you verified that it is the master browser? > In my network, there is yet another Debian Sid box, which is still > running Samba 3.0.20b-2. I'm quite confident that this box will show the > same problem if I do an apt-get (dist-)upgrade on it. I'm not trying it > however, as I've noticed there aren't any Debian Samba packages > available anymore < 3.0.21a (except those for Sarge ofcourse). If > someone can supply me with Debian Samba packages version 3.0.20b-4 > however (the version I'm sure that did not show this problem), I will be > happy to do the test on this box, and mail you the results. You should be able to get previous samba package versions from <http://snapshot.debian.net/>. > If the output from ls -l ... output is still wanted, please let me know > from which box(es) you would like to have it. If you have a box that is running unmodified Debian packages and is showing this workgroup problem, yes, I still want the ls -l output along with the version number of the samba package you have installed. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature