control: tag -1 -patch On Sat, Aug 26 2017, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Seconded with or without the following nit. > > Minor wording nit: I would put a period after "obtained" and make the next > part a separate sentence. ("The copyright file should include a name or > contact address for the upstream authors.") Otherwise, it could be read > as saying that the copyright file can only omit the upstream source > information if the URL pointed to by Homepage includes name or contact > information, but (a) that's not the point of your change, and (b) we want > that contact information to always be in the copyright file if available > because upstream URLs tend to disappear. I don't think this is so minor! The paragraph says that the upstream contact information can just be a URL, and if it is, then I think it could be omitted in favour of the Homepage: field. It was deliberate that my addition applies to both the 'must' and the 'should' requirements. Do you disagree with this? -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature