Hi, I agree, the wording is unfortunate. I've used it because that's what upstream uses. I'm packaging it because it's a new dependency of the Twisted Python library (source package "twisted").
What about: "Hyperlink provides a pure-Python implementation of immutable URLs. Based on RFC 3986 and RFC 3987, the Hyperlink URL balances simplicity and correctness for both URIs and IRIs." which is still upstream's wording, but arguably more clear. IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) <umlae...@debian.org> writes: > hi, > > On 08/27/2017 04:15 PM, Free Ekanayaka wrote: >> Description : A featureful, correct URL for Python >> >> Hyperlink is a featureful, pure-Python implementation of the URL, with >> an emphasis on correctness. > > imho, "A featureful, correct URL for Python" would be https://python.org > (admittedly not *very* featureful), and I don't think that this can be > packaged. > > so i'd like to suggest to improve both the short and the long > description of this package. both speak of "the URL" as if it was an > algorithm or the like.
