control: tag -1 +moreinfo

Hello Yuri,

On Mon, Aug 28 2017, Yuri D'Elia wrote:

> The gnupg2 package in unstable has been renamed again and split into several
> components.

Thanks for letting me know about this.

> The "gnupg" package is now the full suite, while "gpg" contains the
> binary itself. To avoid extra dependencies, it would be nice to update
> the dependency to "gnupg | gnupg2 | gpg".

Well, gnupg2 is a transitional package, so no point in having that.

Would 'gpg' be enough?  The package description says it can't do
anything with secret keys, which would render git-remote-gcrypt pretty
much useless.

I am thinking I should change it to this:

    Depends: gnupg | gnupg1

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to