Probably best to drop this package from the archive then.

On 20 August 2017 at 06:29, Vincent Lefevre <vinc...@vinc17.net> wrote:

> Package: pspresent
> Version: 1.3-4+b2
> Severity: minor
>
> pspresent currently has:
>
> Suggests: chaksem | prosper | foiltex
>
> These are LaTeX packages to produce presentations, and prosper is
> now a transitional dummy package since the class is now provided
> by TeX Live.
>
> This list is not helpful, and is even misleading because:
>   * chaksem is very old and seems no longer maintained upstream;
>   * prosper is now in TeX Live;
>   * foiltex is also quite old and seems no longer maintained upstream
>     (and it is non-free);
>   * there is a better alternative: beamer (in TeX Live), which most
>     people probably use.
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: buster/sid
>   APT prefers unstable-debug
>   APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (500,
> 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
>
> Kernel: Linux 4.12.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=POSIX
> (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
>
> Versions of packages pspresent depends on:
> ii  ghostscript-x  9.21~dfsg-1
> ii  libc6          2.24-14
> ii  libx11-6       2:1.6.4-3
> ii  libxinerama1   2:1.1.3-1+b3
>
> pspresent recommends no packages.
>
> Versions of packages pspresent suggests:
> pn  chaksem | prosper | foiltex  <none>
>
> -- no debconf information
>

Reply via email to