Probably best to drop this package from the archive then. On 20 August 2017 at 06:29, Vincent Lefevre <vinc...@vinc17.net> wrote:
> Package: pspresent > Version: 1.3-4+b2 > Severity: minor > > pspresent currently has: > > Suggests: chaksem | prosper | foiltex > > These are LaTeX packages to produce presentations, and prosper is > now a transitional dummy package since the class is now provided > by TeX Live. > > This list is not helpful, and is even misleading because: > * chaksem is very old and seems no longer maintained upstream; > * prosper is now in TeX Live; > * foiltex is also quite old and seems no longer maintained upstream > (and it is non-free); > * there is a better alternative: beamer (in TeX Live), which most > people probably use. > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: buster/sid > APT prefers unstable-debug > APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, > 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > > Kernel: Linux 4.12.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=POSIX > (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) > > Versions of packages pspresent depends on: > ii ghostscript-x 9.21~dfsg-1 > ii libc6 2.24-14 > ii libx11-6 2:1.6.4-3 > ii libxinerama1 2:1.1.3-1+b3 > > pspresent recommends no packages. > > Versions of packages pspresent suggests: > pn chaksem | prosper | foiltex <none> > > -- no debconf information >