2017-08-29 23:15 GMT+02:00 Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebas...@xs4all.nl>:
> On 06/25/2017 01:15 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > Now stretch is released we can deal with this. > > > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 12:49:33AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: > >> Transition should have minimal impact on these addons. > >> Most other pure Node.js modules should be okay - they either > >> are already compatible with Node.js 6 or have upstream updates > >> providing that compatibility. > > > > This sounds rather, well, hopeful. Please stage the transition in > > experimental first, and test/fix reverse dependencies. Then come back and > > we'll schedule a time to do it in unstable. > > > > (Transitions should really be ready to go by the time they come to us; > > they should also be able to happen quickly, because a blocked transition > > holds up all sorts of other work.) > > Jérémy, the transition was started by the upload of nodejs to unstable, > but you've not replied to the above yet. > > Can you confirm that all reverse dependencies build successfully with > the new nodejs in unstable? > > If so, the binNMUs can be scheduled to move this transition along. > > I just uploaded a new upstream release of node-mapnik, that won't need > an NMU now, but the other rdeps still do. > > Kind Regards, > All the reverse deps of nodejs-abi-xx should rebuild fine. Jérémy
