Hi!

Simon Deziel:
> On 2017-09-20 11:26 AM, intrigeri wrote:
>>> My only concern is what to do when those new rules are stalled
>>> waiting on review? Could they be integrated to the Debian version while
>>> waiting for the official merge? If yes, I think that's the best of both
>>> worlds.
>> 
>> For the record I generally don't wait for upstream to review'n'merge
>> before I apply fixes to AppArmor policy in Debian packages I maintain:
>> the "upstream first" moto does matter to me, but in practice I define
>> it as "submit upstream first and then upload to Debian" rather than as
>> "wait for upstream to ACK my proposed changes before fixing the
>> problem our users are complaining about". So yeah, I think we can
>> definitely have the best of both worlds :)
>> 
>> Now, wrt. Thunderbird specifically: so far, AFAIK the maintainers of
>> src:icedove in Debian haven't bothered taking stuff from upstream's
>> apparmor-profiles.git directly. Instead, they are kind enough to apply
>> any reasonable update we (= mostly Ulrike, but I'm sure she would not
>> mind if you and I gave her a hand) ask them to take.
>> 
>> So I would suggest we forward them any update we think should go in
>> Debian, as soon as we've submitted it upstream, without waiting for
>> upstream to review. Now, let's keep in mind that these changes will go
>> straight to Debian *stable* in the next security upload — if I'm not
>> mistaken). So perhaps a little bit of peer-review would be in order.
>> For example, assuming one of us three sends a merge request to
>> Launchpad, as soon as any of the other two ACKs it, we ask the
>> src:icedove maintainers to take it. I.e. we piggy pack on the existing
>> upstream review process and tools and save some paperwork.
>> 
>> Deal?

> Sure works for me, thanks for proposing this sensible workflow!

OK, glad we're on the same page :)

Let's wait for Ulrike's input before closing this bug though.

Ulrike, what do you think?

FTR I've just requested commit access to the Vcs-Git of src:icedove,
which if granted might streamline the process a bit more :)

Cheers,
-- 
intrigeri

Reply via email to