Hi Jan, > BTW, I wonder if it would be possible to use a common l10n package for > both psi ans psi+. The differences seem to be rather small.
I do not think that this is a good idea. Yes, now the difference between Psi+ and Psi sources is not such huge as in the past. But they have been developing with a different speed [1]: Psi has been developing using classic releases model, but for Psi+ the rolling release development model is used. And even if there are very few new text strings are came into Psi+, the old text strings might be changed. (As it was in recent releases.) More over, stable releases of Psi are prepared in a separate git branches and they include only part of changes from master branch, where patches from Psi+ are come. Because of this Psi will have much more untranslated strings if it will use Psi+ translations directly. And that is why I keep support two independent git repos with translations for Psi [2] and Psi+ [3]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psi_(instant_messaging_client)#History [2] https://github.com/psi-im/psi-l10n [3] https://github.com/psi-plus/psi-plus-l10n Best regards, Boris
