Package: fp-utils-3.0.0
Version: 3.0.0+dfsg-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
I have installed texlive-latex-recommended and fp-utils-3.0.0. Files
lstlang[123].sty are installed
by both packages in different destinations, however, ones that are
brought by fp-utils-3.0.0 are
older, but are found first in TeX path (I use pdflatex). I was trying
to get 'bash' syntax
highlight, but it is not found in lstlang1.sty of fp-utils-3.0.0.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
I have removed fp-utils-3.0.0, that solved the problem.
* What was the outcome of this action?
TeX document compiled successfully.
* What outcome did you expect instead?
I expected 'bash' syntax highlight coming from
texlive-latex-recommended.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers xenial-updates
APT policy: (500, 'xenial-updates'), (500, 'xenial-security'), (500,
'xenial'), (100, 'xenial-backports')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.10.0-35-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages fp-utils-3.0.0 depends on:
ii fpc-source-3.0.0 3.0.0+dfsg-2
ii libc6 2.23-0ubuntu9
Versions of packages fp-utils-3.0.0 recommends:
ii fp-compiler-3.0.0 3.0.0+dfsg-2
fp-utils-3.0.0 suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
