Quoting Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > While I'm at it, something VERY important that slept out in this > > discussion : the list of supported languages for sarge is > > *closed*. For size constraints, and for being sure that we don't > > induce problems with initrd size for D-I RC2 and now RC3, Joey Hess > > has requested that we stop adding languages to sarge-targeted D-I. > > It would still be nice to have the Esperanto locale in sarge, if that > can be arranged.
Sure. gotom and locales/glibc maintainers, any status about this old bug ? Is it delayed post-sarge, ignored (if so, it should be tagged "wontfix", imho) or possible to be included in sarge? There's a chance that a translation begins for Esperanto in Debian Installer and we at least to have some visibility about the locale name. I personnally tend to favour eo_XX. Edmind has suggested eo_AQ (Antarctica), based on the special status of this territory as part of mankind's patrimonium. Others (in -esperanto) have suggested eo_EU which I don't think is appropriate for a universal language...