Hello, 2017-11-18 6:21 GMT+01:00 Petter Reinholdtsen <p...@hungry.com>:
> [Ludovic Rousseau] > > 0ad (0.0.22-2) unstable; urgency=medium > > . > > * Fix "0ad FTBFS with on armhf with gcc 7: error: call of overloaded > > 'abs(unsigned int)' is ambiguous" by removing support of armhf > > (Closes: #879071) > > Note, this "fix" did not work, as there are armhf binaries in the archive > and the new version is not allowed to propagate into testing until the > armhf binaries are updated to the latest version or removed. Did you > file a request for removal? > Adrian Bunk filed bug #880058 "RM: 0ad [armhf] -- NBS; no longer built on armhf" I am not sure it will be enough since the versions for arm64, kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 must also be removed. Should I create 3 new bugs for the other 3 architectures? This bug just caused 0ad to be removed from testing. > Yes. I saw that. Thanks -- Dr. Ludovic Rousseau
