On Monday 20 November 2017 08:48:40 Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 2017-11-20 8:39, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Saturday 18 November 2017 20:13:14 Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > Control: tags -1 + pending > > > > > > On Fri, 2017-11-10 at 17:59 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [...] > > > > Particularly, I'd have pointed out that the changelog is illogical - > > > > it should either be 1.3-1, then the 1.3-2 unstable changes, then 1.3- > > > > 2~deb9u1, or 1.3-1 then 1.3-1+deb9u1. > > > > > > I'm not going to bother with a reject-and-reupload cycle this time, > > > but > > > please don't assume that won't happen in future. This: > > > > > > +udftools (1.3-2~deb9u1) stretch; urgency=low > > > + > > > + * Fix path to pktsetup in udftools init script > > > + > > > + -- Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> Tue, 03 Oct 2017 21:41:57 > > > +0200 > > > + > > > udftools (1.3-1) unstable; urgency=low > > > > > > is simply wrong. > > > > Ok, I would like to ask, which version to choose if uploaded package is > > exactly same as version X in unstable? As in unstable is version 1.3-2 I > > chose that suffix ~deb9u1. But I have not found any details about this > > situation in any debian manual. > > The version number is fine. The problem is that the changelog should have > included the unstable stanza for 1.3-2, with the ~deb9u1 stanza then simply > being "rebuild for stable" or something similar. This is the same as I'd > expect if you were uploading the package to stretch-backports.
Ok, thanks for information! I though problem is with version string. Do you want to reupload it with fix in changelog? -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com