On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez <cor...@debian.org> wrote: > I have to admit I really don't like this approach. Also, it's looks like a > policy break, unless it's somehow agreed accross Debian that gtk engines are > not standard packages and shouldn't obey their shlibsdeps, I don't think it we > should do that.
There are other packages that excludes dependencies from dh_shlibdeps: https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=path%3Adebian%2Frules+dh_shlibdeps.*-x https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=path%3Adebian%2Frules+dh_shlibdeps.*--exclude https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=path%3Adebian%2Frules+DEB_DH_MAKESHLIBS_ARG.*--exclude&perpkg=1 I don't think Debian Policy forbids my proposal. Could you explain how my proposal would break anything? Thanks, Jeremy Bicha
