On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 08:18:52AM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Sébastien Villemot <sebast...@debian.org> > wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 12:11:09PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 04:26:10PM -0600, Simon Quigley wrote: > >> - since the version number of the old series (15.10-1) is higher than the > >> new > >> one (0.81-1), the epoch needs to be bumped (i.e. we should use 1:0.81-1). > > There is an interesting hack where only the old package names need the > epoch bump. > > See for instance > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-fonts/fonts-ubuntu.git/commit/?id=046b11af
Thanks for sharing. That hack would actually open the door to a 3rd transition scheme: - keeping only the gcompris-qt source package (src:gcompris can be immediately removed) - keeping gcompris-qt as the main binary package - having gcompris as a transitional package, generated by src:gcompris-qt, and would be the only binary package with an epoch number That scheme looks like a good compromise to me. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature