Hi Abou, On 11-12-17 10:20, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > This is now done, we now have unit packages co-installable. However, > There is still an issue with fp-compiler package. It contains some > executables that are installed in /usr/bin while is is MA same according > to this report > <https://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/pkg-pascal-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org.html#fpc>. > > As far as I can see fpc-3.0.4, fpcmkcfg-3.0.4, and fpcres-3.0.4 are > tools and should be moved to fp-utils. In this case I'd make fp-compiler > recommend fp-utils. > Then there is grab_vcsa-3.0.4 which is a tool that is specific to video > unit, and that shall be installed by fp-units-base, but this is not my > preference as this just moves the problem to that package. I would > rather move grab_vcsa-3.0.4 to fp-utils, and make the fp-units-base > recommend fp-utils (maybe not needed as it recommends fp-compiler). > > What do you think about this proposal?
I don't see obvious flaws in your proposal so I think it is OK. But I think you didn't fix this in your upload to unstable, so Lintian is now complaining loudly about all this, as is the MA hinter: https://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/pkg-pascal-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org.html#fpc and https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/fpc Just curious, why did you upload to unstable without fixing these issues first? Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
