Am Mittwoch, den 20.12.2017, 11:59 +0000 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > On 2017-12-20 10:35, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > rdma-core is the new source package that takes over several rdma > > related > > source packages. Therefore it takes over several binary packages, > > but > > it > > does not break the API of the existing binary library packages. The > > package builds on all linux architectures and the excuses for rdma- > > core > > look good: > > > > * Migration status: OK: Will attempt migration (Any information > > below > > is purely informational) > > * 8 days old (needed 5 days) > > * Piuparts tested OK - > > https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/r/rdma-core.html > > * Valid candidate > > > > Is there a reason why the package does not migrate? > > If there weren't a reason, it would have migrated, surely? > > The (publicly available via HTTP, and DD-accessible via SSH) log > says: > > trying: rdma-core > skipped: rdma-core (0, 22, 197) > got: 32+0: a-2:i-24:a-0:a-0:a-0:m-2:m-3:m-0:p-0:s-1 > * mips: libibverbs1-dbg, librdmacm1-dbg
Where do I find this log? I failed to find it. Is the location documented somewhere? It would be nice if that could be linked from the tracker, e.g. https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rdma-core points to https://release.debian.org/britney/update_excuses.html#rdma-core > > Can you push it to migrate? > > I've added this hint, which seems to work fine in a test run: > > easy rdma-core/16.0-1 -librdmacm/1.1.0-2 -libibverbs/1.2.1-2 Thanks. -- Benjamin Drung System Developer Debian & Ubuntu Developer ProfitBricks GmbH Greifswalder Str. 207 D - 10405 Berlin Email: benjamin.dr...@profitbricks.com URL: https://www.profitbricks.de Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 125506 B Geschäftsführer: Achim Weiss, Matthias Steinberg