Hello,

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:07:16PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Currently there are two versions of libupnp in the archive:
> 
>  - src:libupnp providing the 1.6.x branch of libupnp which is considered
>    legacy by upstream
>  - src:pupnp-1.8 providing the 1.8.x branch of libupnp
> 
> I want to get rid of libupnp6 converting all rdeps to the newer libupnp
> package.
> 
> There are not that many reverse dependencies for libupnp6:
> 
>       amule
>       amule-daemon
>       djmount
>       gmediarender
>       gmediaserver
>       libmediastreamer-base3
>       linphone
>       linphone-nogtk
>       linux-igd
>       mpd
>       openclonk
>       ring-daemon
>       silverjuke
>       vlc-plugin-base
>       wmaloader

Just a heads up with the current status of the affected packages (in
form of my todo list, I hope it is understandable):

 - amule
   - FTBFS #884996 (patch)
 - djmount
   - FTBFS #884243
 - gmediaserver
   - FTBFS #884245
 - gmrender-resurrect
   - FTBFS #884246
 - linphone
   - FTBFS #884247
 - linux-igd
   - triggers #884252 ("libupnp-dev: missing ThreadPool.h", fixed-upstream)
   - uses libupnp6 internal stuff (TimerThread.h) and so probably FTBFSs
     when #884252 is fixed with no easy patch fixing that.
   - package orphaned, maintainer MIA
 - mpd
   - builds fine
 - openclonk
   - builds fine
 - ring
   - FTBFS #884249
 - silverjuke
   - FTBFS #884250 (patch, forwarded)
 - vlc
   - builds fine
 - wmaloader
   - FTBFS #884251
   - RM #884637

I wonder how important it is to fix linux-igd compared with the effort
this will produce. Maybe it's sensible to remove it?

So five patches (djmount, gmediaserver, gmrender-resurrect, linphone,
ring) still to create before we could start the transition. I didn't
look into these yet.

Best regards
Uwe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to