On 30/12/17 13:06, Chris Lamb wrote: >> Also, how can it be a DFSG violation?
> It was just an entirely-generic list of possible problems, don't > worry. Ah, OK. >> I really don't see much the point of removing it, or making a very >> complicated >> files-excluded field. > > Mmm. I have a rough plan to make this an autoreject Lintian tag, so that > would be problematic here. :) > > Would something like (untested) "cmd/sockaddr/vendor/*/*" not work, ooi? I guess.. Also, we should probably remove that field from most packages, since we have decided to use upstream git history, and repack on git, so there is no real usage for it --except documentation. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho)
