Hi, On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 02:02:10AM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: [..snip..] > Also, isn't commit-tree configurable at all? git-commit-tree(1) doesn't > mention any configuration item, and neither does the zsh autocompletion. > Having a commit-tree.gpgsign config item (defaulting to the value of > commit.gpgsign, IMHO, but not necessarily) would definitly cover this > bug report.
I don't think it's configurable. I've reused this bugreport for gbp so if we want a "please make --sign-tags configurable in commit-tree" we need to clone again. > > It's possible that there's a use case that > > would warrant it. But for this particular use case, passing the > > option explicitly from "gbp import-orig" seems preferable. > > Right, it probably makes sense for gbp to do something clever here. > > Anyway, as I said I'd call myself happy with whatever solution that > doesn't make me pass extra manual flags, tweaking user configuration > files of any kind is fine :) > > > Anyway, did something changed behaviour "recently"? Like gbp starting > to use commit-tree instead of commit? Not that I can think off. Maybe git changes some defaults? Cheers, -- Guido
