On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 09:13:24AM -0500, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote: > Conversely, if the patches are invasive and unmaintainable, its not on Debian > to merge them.
Yes. But adding a "nosystemd" build profile is in no way "invasive and unmaintainable". (why the top-post?) > On Jan 3, 2018 9:09 AM, "Wouter Verhelst" <wou...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 01:59:05PM +0100, Andrew Shadura wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 3 January 2018 at 13:12, Hleb Valoshka <375...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Package: general > > > Severity: wishlist > > > > > > Please introduce official nosystemd build profile so downstream > > > distributions can send patches to package maintainers with > > > systemd-less build instead of keep them in home. > > > > Do we really need systemd-less builds? I'm not convinced this is > > something relevant to Debian. > > We don't *need* them, but it's not a problem if people want to support > it. Debian has always allowed things to be defined by those that want to > do the work. > > If adding an official "nosystemd" build profile makes life easier for > people who want to support systemd-less builds, and they send patches to > keep the build profile actually working, then that doesn't hurt us in > any way and I think we should do it. > > -- > Could you people please use IRC like normal people?!? > > -- Amaya Rodrigo Sastre, trying to quiet down the buzz in the DebConf > 2008 > Hacklab > > > -- Could you people please use IRC like normal people?!? -- Amaya Rodrigo Sastre, trying to quiet down the buzz in the DebConf 2008 Hacklab