On Thursday, January 04, 2018 09:02:10 AM Chris Lamb wrote: > tags 886303 + wontfix > thanks > > Hi Scott, > > > There is no python3-qscintilla2, but there is python3-pyqt4.qsci > > Getcha. However, this doesn't seem like a common case and weakening > the general case & making it a little more magic doesn't seem the best > approach IMHO. Indeed, it's almost a feature of the current test that > it is so "dumb" and thus easily understandable and explainable. > > This case seems like a perfect case for an override, especially as that > provides a perfect place to explain the names of the package. > > Naturally if we find many more examples we can revisit, but I don't think > we should change this right now. :)
As discussed, stepic is another case of this that I just ran into. The test was a useful reminder that it hadn't been ported to python3 in 0.3-5, but once I did the port in 0.3-6 it was still there due to the way the package renaming test was done. Maybe if you look for python:Depends, but no python3:Depends that would reduce the false positives without being excessively magical. Scott K