X-Debbugs-CC: cl...@debian.org, adcon...@0c3.net, m...@suse.de, j...@suse.cz, a...@suse.de
El dc 31 de 01 de 2018 a les 13:51 +0000, Michael Matz va escriure: > hmm? Here let me show you the interop problem with your suggestion: > > % gcc -Wl,-dynamic-linker,/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 -o hello ~/src/hello.c You are trying to run an unsupported binary without following the installation procedure on a system without compatibility mode. Let me remind my counterexample:[2] $ sudo dpkg -i hello-nolib64_0.1_amd64.deb Selecting previously unselected package hello-nolib64. (Reading database ... 55548 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../hello-nolib64_0.1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking hello-nolib64 (0.1) ... Setting up hello-nolib64 (0.1) ... $ hello-nolib64 Hello, world! > So, uhm, you think it's acceptable to force everyone else to create a > symlink because it's not acceptable to you? No, I am not forcing anyone to do anything.[3] I respect your users that love the /lib64 directory and find /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 ugly. -- [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=888073#60 [3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=888073#165
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
