Hi, On 27/01/18 19:13, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 16:12:14 +0100 Gianfranco Costamagna > <locutusofb...@debian.org> wrote: >> On Thu, 4 Jan 2018 14:30:08 +0000 James Cowgill <jcowg...@debian.org> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 04/01/18 14:26, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>>> Is there a way for me to run your testcase without ghc-stage1 (which >>>>> would require building ghc)? >>>> >>>> I don't know, however I attached ghc-stage1 binaries to the report >>> >>> The "ghc-stage1" you attached is a shell script which execs some other >>> binary which you didn't attach. >>> >> >> this is true, I hope you can get from my home in eller.debian.org :) >> > > hello, ping? > (this is the last blocker for ghc 8.2 in unstable, unfortunately somebody > would like to remove from mips instead of delaying the transition any longer)
Sorry I got a bit sidetracked working on other things. I have a slightly reduced testcase, but it still requires about 50M of objects so I'm working on reducing it even more. I did a test compile of ghc using the bfd linker and it does build (pass --disable-ld-override to ghc configure). This might be usable as a workaround if you don't want to delay the transition. I expect this will make ghc / haskell build times increase a lot on mips* though. Thanks, James
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
