On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 11:48:18PM +0100, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> > It's quite unfortunate that the allowed_ips variable doesn't accept the
> > normal address/mask format, because that way there is no easy way to
> > specify networks such as 213.202.64.0/18, let alone something larger.
>
> I agree with this statement. But, from my experience, people don't play
> a lot with anything outside 192.168.0.* or 127.0.0.1. But off course, i
> will be better to adress everything in the netmask... I think you would
> agree that this bug is "wishlist"...
Well, perhaps minor, but not wishlist, because I think it's silly to expect
people to maintain an IP access list without netmask support. It's 2006 :)
It doesn't even extend only to larger blocks - think smaller networks too -
how do you specify a /26, skip the next /27, and then include another /27?
It's simply painful :)
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
