Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 06/10/17 01:09, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 10/05/2017 11:49 PM, Christoph Biedl wrote: >> So please take this to gcc first unless you've >> already done so. And let us know if you get the impression this won't >> get fixed soon-ish - breaking an architecture still beats packaging >> principles. > > gcc bugs aren't usually something that get fixed promptly, in particular > when talking about non-mainstream architectures like m68k.
Hi Adrian, Is this still a problem with current gcc on m68k? I see that gcc points at gcc-7 (>= 7.2.0-1~) in sid and, as far as I can tell, it also applies to m68k. To me this is really a gcc bug, and the fix belongs there. busybox has a real interest in remaining small on several architectures, and I really don't believe a workaround like this belongs in the busybox package. Cheers, Chris -- Chris Boot bo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature