On 2018-02-18 05:51, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Feb 2018, Axel Burri wrote: >>> Hi Axel, > >>> On a somewhat tangentially related topic, please address these two >>> lintian errors when you have a chance: >>> https://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/a...@tty0.ch.html#btrbk > > >> python-script-but-no-python-dep > >> The issue here is that btrbk does not depend on python. There are python >> scripts for use with (experimental) kdf encryption, I still want to ship >> them, but the people enabling this know about they have to install >> python. Is there a way to just silence this lintian report? > > yeap > https://lintian.debian.org/manual/section-2.4.html > >> debian-rules-is-dh_make-template > >> This one is new to me, I'm not sure how to resolve it, I'm not a debian >> user myself and have limited knowledge about the packaging system. I >> will happily merge pull requests which fix this on: > >> https://github.com/digint/btrbk-packaging/tree/debian > > it is benign, either silence it or it might go away if you remove in the > header > # See debhelper(7) (uncomment to enable) > # output every command that modifies files on the build system. > #DH_VERBOSE = 1 > > which is I bet what it makes lintian think it is too close to the > original >
Thanks, I'll address these issues on the next (btrbk-0.26.1) release, scheduled in a week or two.
